SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2198

J. C. DOSHI
Taluka Panchayat – Appellant
Versus
Harijan Raghavbhai Khimjibhai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Apurva Jani for Ashish M. Dagli
For the Respondents: Dixa U. Pandya

JUDGMENT :

J.C. Doshi, J.

1. As in both the second appeals, the impugned judgment and decree is common, one and the same, with the consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Second Appeal No.30 of 2001 is filed against the judgment and order dated 26.4.2000 passed by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Morbi in Civil Misc. Appeal No.5 of 1998, whereby the learned appellate Court modified the judgment and decree dated 31.12.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Wankaner in Regular Civil Suit No.57 of 1991 to the extent of allowing the cross objection-cum-appeal by directing the defendant Panchayat to pay up the entire amount of salary with effect from impugned order dated 6.5.1991 till today within a period of three months from the date of this judgment.

2.1. Second Appeal No.29 of 2001 is filed against the judgment and order dated 26.4.2000 passed by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Morbi in RCA No.1 of 1998, whereby the learned appellate Court confirmed the judgment and decree dated 31.12.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Wankaner in Regular Civil Suit No.57 of 1991.

3. Brief facts of the case ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top