SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Nirzar S. Desai, J.
Tagros Chemicals India Private Limited - Appellant
Vs.
State of Gujarat and Ors. - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 15317 of 2023
Decided On: 01-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Aadit R. Sanjanwala
For the Respondents: Krushita Dave, Assistant Government Pleader

A valid certificate of an agriculturist suffices for granting permission under Section 65B, and rejection based on unverified status is unjustified.

Headnote:(A) Bombay Land Revenue Code - Section 65B - Petition challenging rejection of application for converting agricultural land to industrial use - The petitioner, an industrialist, sought permission under Section 65B for land purchased for industrial purposes, which was denied on grounds of predecessor's status as an agriculturist. The court found that the certificate of the predecessor as an agriculturist was valid and should have been accepted without further inquiry. (Paras 9, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of natural justice - The authority's rejection of the application based on unverified status of the predecessor was deemed unjustified as the certificate was valid and no inquiry was warranted. (Paras 9.1, 9.2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner purchased land for industrial use, previously owned by an agriculturist, and applied for permission under Section 65B, which was rejected twice by the Collector on the grounds of verifying the predecessor's status.

Findings of Court:
The court found the rejection of the application to be erroneous and quashed the orders, remanding the matter back to the Collector for reconsideration.

Issues: The main issues were whether the predecessor's status as an agriculturist was relevant for granting permission under Section 65B and the validity of the certificate issued to the predecessor.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the valid certificate of the predecessor as an agriculturist was sufficient for granting permission, and the authority's rejection based on unverified status was unjustified.

Result: Petition allowed; orders quashed and remanded for reconsideration.

JUDGMENT :

Nirzar S. Desai, J.

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.6.2023 as well as order dated 21.7.2023 whereby the petitioner's application seeking permission for converting the land into industrial purpose under Section 65B was rejected.

2. By consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, the matter was taken up for final hearing. Hence, RULE. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Krushita Dave waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. Heard learned advocate Mr. Aadit R. Sanjanwala appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Krushita Dave appearing for the respondent-State.

4. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-

"(a) That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside communications dated 29.06.2023 (Annexure-A) and 21.07.2023 (Annexure-B) and further be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction mandating the Collector, Bharuch to expeditiously reconsider and grant the Certificate under Section 65B to the Petitioner;

(b) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders directing the Collector, Bharuch to expeditiously reconsider and grant the Certificate under Section 65B to the Petitioner;

(c) Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) above;

(d) For costs;

(e) For such other and further reliefs that the Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice."

5. The brief facts giving rise to the petition as stated in the petition are as under :-

5.1 It is the case of the petitioner that the dispute is in respect of land bearing Block No. 188 (Old Survey No. 1004) of Village Dahej, Taluka Vagra, District Bharuch. The petitioner is the present owner of the land in question and he has purchased the above land by way of a registered sale deed dated 6.10.2021. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing agrochemicals and other allied segments and having its registered office at Chennai and manufacturing plant is in Dahej, Gujarat. The manufacturing plant of the petitioner company is situated on land bearing Survey Nos. 979, 980, 981, 982, 990, 995, 996 and 1002 of Village Dahej, District Bharuch. The land in question having old survey No. 1004 is the land which is immediately adjoining the land of the aforesaid land on which the petitioner's manufacturing plant was originally established.

5.2 As the petitioner was intending to expand its manufacturing unit, he purchased the land bearing survey Nos. 1003 and 1004 by way of a registered sale deed dated 6.10.2021 and as the land was purchased with a view to utilize it for bonafide industrial purpose, according to the petitioner, no prior agricultural use permission was required under Section 65. According to the petitioner, though the petitioner is entitled to commence the use of bonafide industrial purpose and obtained certificate under Section 65(B) and more particularly, under Section 65B(1)(b)(ii), if the occupant of the land utilizes or used or held the land for the agricultural purpose such use of land shall be lawful for him to use such land for bonafide industrial purpose without permission of the Collector subject to fulfillment of aforesaid condition.

5.3 According to the petitioner, as per Section 65B(2)(b) when an occupant commences the use of the land for a bonafide industrial purpose, he shall, within 30 days from the date of commencement of use, send a notice of date of commencements along with other particulars to the Collector, who is empowered to make an inquiry under Sub-section 3 of the Section 65B and then if the Collector is satisfied about the use of land then he shall issue a certificate to that effect.

5.4 Accordingly, the petitioner applied before the Collector, Bharuch to obtain the Certificate under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top