Back
DIVYESH A. JOSHI
RAJUBHAI CHATURBHAI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the incident. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense arguments regarding evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. prosecution's objections to bail. (Para 5) |
| 4. court analysis of evidence and intentions. (Para 6 , 10 , 18) |
| 5. legal definitions and implications. (Para 7 , 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. court's assessment of evidence and legality of actions. (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 16) |
| 7. criteria for attempt to murder conviction. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 8. parody of bail applications considered. (Para 19) |
| 9. final ruling on bail application. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. I-11211015220028 of 2022 registered with the Dhragandhra City Police Station, Surenranagar of the offence punishable under Sections 307 , 323, 324, 504, 506(2) read with Section 114 of the IPC and Section 135 of the G.P. Act.
2. The facts in brief leading to the filing of the present application may be summarized as under:
Court emphasized that bail applications must be evaluated on the basis of the accused's specific role and the seriousness of the charges, not merely on parity with co-accused.
The court denied bail due to the applicant's serious conduct and multiple offences, emphasizing that the principle of parity does not apply uniformly in bail applications.
Point of law: In order to attract punishable offence under Section 307 Indian Penal Code, the prosecution is required to prove the intention or knowledge to commit the murder and the actual act of tr....
The intention to cause death and the sufficiency of the acts to cause death in the ordinary course of nature are essential elements of the offense of attempt to murder under Section 307 of the IPC. C....
The court modified the conviction of the accused from attempted murder to causing grievous hurt, emphasizing the need for direct evidence in serious charges.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the intention of the accused in a criminal act may be deduced from circumstances and the nature of injuries caused, and it is not essential th....
The court upheld the conviction for culpable homicide under Section 304, Part I, emphasizing the absence of intent to kill and the nature of the incident as a sudden fight.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of evidence, contradictions in witness testimony, and the applicability of specific sections of the Indian Penal Code, considerin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
