Back
A. S. SUPEHIA, M. R. MENGDEY
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Prakash @ Piddu Mithubhai Mulani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court challenged previous acquittal regarding evidence misapplication. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court emphasized weight of dying declarations and prosecution evidence. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. deceased's statement deemed reliable under law despite minor discrepancies. (Para 12 , 16) |
| 4. court clarified standards for murder conviction versus culpable homicide. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. Vide order dated 04.09.2023, after hearing the learned Advocates for the respective parties and on analysis of the evidence, oral as well as documentary and on perusal of the judgment and order of the trial Court, we had recorded the guilt of accused No.1 - Prakash @ Piddu Mithubhai Mulani. We had set aside the judgment and order passed by the trial Court acquitting the accused and the matter was kept for hearing on the question whether the conviction should be recorded under Sections 302 , 304 Part-I or 304 Part-II of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1806 (IPC). Today, we have again extended the opportunity to the learned advocate Dr.Hardik K. Raval appearing for the accused no.1 to make his submissions.
2. On 04.09.2023, the following order was passed:
Dying declarations are admissible as sole evidence for conviction if credible; mere acquittal by trial court can be overturned if found perverse.
The reliability of dying declarations and the application of the fourth exception to Section 300 of IPC in cases of sudden quarrel and heat of passion.
The dying declaration, if found to be true, voluntary, and reliable, can be the sole basis for conviction without the need for corroboration. The court may rely on the dying declaration as the primar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on dying declaration as a sole basis for conviction under Section 302/34 of IPC, the interpretation of Section 498A of IPC, and the ap....
Point of Law : Hostility of witnesses of fact cannot demolish the value and reliability of the dying declaration of the deceased, which has been proved by prosecution in accordance with law and is a ....
The dying declaration was the sole basis for conviction, and the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 299 and 300 of the Indian Penal Code was cr....
The judgment established the distinction between culpable homicide and murder under the IPC, and applied recent legal principles allowing for reduced incarceration periods for similar offenses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of evaluating dying declarations and medical opinions in cases of criminal offenses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
