Back
ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Rajan Ankleshwaria S/O Manojkumar Babulal Ankleshwariya – Appellant
Versus
Vinni Ankleshwaria D/O Mahesh Gulshanrai Malhotra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh Shastri, J.
1. By way of present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , appellant- original applicant has challenged the validity of an order dated 4.7.2023 passed below Exh.6 of Civil Misc. Application No.4 of 2023 passed by learned Principal Family Court at Anand.
2. The background of case which has given rise to present appeal is that appellant and respondent got married on 19.1.2013 and on 19.1.2014, their marriage was solemnized as per Hindu Customary Rites and Ceremonies at Anand and during their wedlock, a son, named as Dhven, was born on 26.7.2018. According to appellant, during passage of time, some difference of opinion generated between appellant and respondent and according to appellant, respondent wife left the matrimonial house on 26.10.2022 without any valid reason. When the respondent left the house, their son was with appellant husband at his residence at Ahmedabad and appellant alone used to take care of all needs of the son and used to take care of academic schedule and used to pick and drop the son from school. Later on, some arrangement has taken place for dropping the son with res
The court clarified that an order granting visitation rights is an intermediary order, thus appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Interlocutory orders under the Family Courts Act are not appealable; custody decisions must prioritize the welfare of minors by considering their perspectives.
A custody order under the Guardians and Wards Act, if a result of a full trial, is appealable and not merely interlocutory.
Granting interim maintenance to daughter of appellant-wife and rejection of all other applications – dismissal of husband’s petition for restitution of conjugal rights whereby wife’s rights do not ne....
Family Court's interlocutory orders regarding visitation are not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, especially when subsequent events alter the initial conditions significantly.
An order rejecting an amendment application is an interlocutory order and not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, as it does not decide substantive rights.
Minor child does not have coping skills or intellectual ability to understand issues between adult relationship or parents unhappiness.
The Family Court has jurisdiction to grant relief under the Domestic Violence Act, and its findings cannot be overturned by a Single Judge under Article 227 without a clear jurisdictional error.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
