MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Amit Vyas S/o Suresh Chand Vyas – Appellant
Versus
Pramila @ Ranjana W/o Amit Vyas – Respondent
ORDER :
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
By Review Petition No. 79/2018, the review applicant (appellant in connected D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1709/2020, 1712/2020 and 1718/2020) has sought review of order dated 27.10.2017 passed in D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3744/2016, Amit Vyas Vs. Pramila Alias Ranjana, whereby, appeal directed against an order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Hindu Marriage Act’), granting interim maintenance to the respondent-wife, was held not maintainable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for short ‘the Family Courts Act’).
2. Learned counsel for the review-applicant would argue that though earlier an order was passed on 27.10.2017, dismissing the appeal as not maintainable, it being against an order of grant of maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act in favour of the respondent-wife, relying upon various decisions of different High Courts as also this Court, later on the issue with regard to maintainability of appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against an order of grant of maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been resolved by
Chandra Prakash v. State of U.P.
Captain Ramesh Chander Kaushal Vs. Mrs. Veena Kaushal and Others (1978) 4 SCC 70
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
Roger Shashoua and Others Vs. Mukesh Sharma and Others (2017) 14 SCC 722
Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra
State of Gujarat & Another Vs. Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji Jadeja
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.