SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 170

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
JCD
BHARATKUMAR SHANTILAL DAVE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SS SAIYED(3690) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

J. C. DOSHI, J.

1. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”), the applicant seeks quashing of the FIR registered as CR No.II-48 of 2017 registered with Unjha Police Station, Mehsana for the offence punishable under Sections 507 of the Indian Penal Code and further proceedings arising thereof.

2. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties.

3. Seeking quashment of the FIR filed under Section 507 of IPC, learned advocate Mr.S.S.Saiyed for the petitioner would submit that as per the FIR filthy and derogatory language was spoken on the Mobile No.9825250202 which is said to have been belonge to the first informant from the Mobile No.9825684001 belonging to the petitioner at around 21.50 hours in midnight on 25.03.2017. Learned advocate Mr.Saiyed would submit that as per the call details produced at Annexure-B on such date no phone was ever made by petitioner from his mobile number to the mobile number stated to have been belonged to the first informant. Therefore, he submits that totally baseless and frivolous FIR has been filed. He also brought to the notice of the Court that department proceedings were pending a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top