Back
VIKAS BAHL
Gurmail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of petition to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal arguments supporting quashing fir. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial observations on complaint history. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. observations on concealment of facts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. legal standards for exercising section 482. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. significance of judicial history in fir context. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. analysis of criminal intimidation elements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. arguments against the charges of extortion. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. final observations before judgment. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. conclusion and rationale for quashing fir. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. judgment to quash the fir. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Bahl, J.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.236 dated 15.09.2021 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 384 , 511 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Lehra,
2. District Sangrur along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.
3. The FIR in the present case has been registered on 15.09.2021, on the statement of respondent No.2 Jagdeep Singh/complainant, as per which, the occurrence has bee
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
