SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 256

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAVAL JAGURTIBEN KISHANBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. SHIVAM N THAKKAR(10024) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat. Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, does not press this application qua applicant No.2. Hence, present application stands disposed of as not pressed qua applicant No.2 – Kishankumar Chamanbhai Raval.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant No.1 has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11206073240539 of 2024 registered with Vadnagar Police Station, Dist. Mahesana, for the offences punishable under Sections 316(5), 319(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. The applicant is lady and has no past antecedent. She is not named in FIR. During investigation, based on the statement of the co-accused, she has been arraigned as an accused. She was not aware about the transaction, but her husband used to her account. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top