SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 741

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
JAGRUTIBEN CHIRAGBHAI RATHVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS. NANDINI NAIR(16934) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11196016240682 of 2024 registered with Makarpura Police Station, Vadodara City, for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(2) of BNS.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. Pursuant to the order dated 04.02.2025, the applicant has appeared before the Investigating ofÏcer and joined investigation. However, the offence is punishable upto 7 years. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

[4.0] Having heard the learned advocate for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top