SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 741

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 2128 of 2025 ==========================================================
JAGRUTIBEN CHIRAGBHAI RATHVA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MS. NANDINI NAIR(16934) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR HK PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 17/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MS. NANDINI NAIR(16934) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Anticipatory bail may be granted when the applicant demonstrates non-involvement in the offence and willingness to cooperate with the investigation, considering the nature of the charges and absence of prior convictions.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 316(2), 318(2), and 35 - Anticipatory bail application - The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with a serious offence punishable up to 7 years, asserting non-involvement and cooperation with the investigation. The court emphasized the need for judicious discretion in bail matters, considering factors such as the nature of the accusation and the applicant's antecedents. (Paras 1.0, 4.0, 5.0)

(B) Bail - Principles governing anticipatory bail - The court reiterated that bail should be granted cautiously, considering the gravity of the offence and the applicant's willingness to cooperate with the investigation. (Paras 4.0, 5.0)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, facing charges under the BNSS, claimed non-involvement and readiness to cooperate with the investigation. The prosecution opposed bail due to the serious nature of the charges.

Findings of Court:
The court granted anticipatory bail, allowing the applicant to be released on a personal bond, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with the investigation.

Issues: The main issues included the applicant's involvement in the offence and the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail given the nature of the charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's cooperation and lack of prior convictions warranted the granting of anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding the application.

Result: Application allowed.

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11196016240682 of 2024 registered with Makarpura Police Station, Vadodara City, for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(2) of BNS.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. Pursuant to the order dated 04.02.2025, the applicant has appeared before the Investigating ofÏcer and joined investigation. However, the offence is punishable upto 7 years. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

[4.0] Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicant to flee from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons touching the merit of the case, which may prejudice the accused, should be avoided. I have considered the following aspects.

(1) Pursuant to the order dated 04.02.2025, the applicant has appeared before the Investigating ofÏcer and joined investigation.

(2) The offence is punishable maximum upto 7 years

(3) Applicant has no past antecedent.

(4) In view of Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and proposition of law as settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar reported in (2014)8 SCC 273; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022)10 SCC 51 and Md. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and Another reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892, application deserves consideration.

(5) Applicant is ready and willing to join further investigatio, if necessary.

[5.0] Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and propositions laid down in cases of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar reported in (2014)8 SCC 273; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022)10 SCC 51 and Md. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and Another reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892, I am inclined to allow the present application.

[6.0] In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicant in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11196016240682 of 2024 registered with Makarpura Police Station, Vadodara City, the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top