Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
ABDUL REHMAN ABDUL LATIF SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191067240122 of 2024 registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Ahmedabad City, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act 2000.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that in the present offence investigation is over and charge sheet is filed. The Applicant has been arrested in connection with the present offence on 24.04.2024 and since then the Applicant is in the custody. The only allegation levelled against the present Applicant is that the Bank Account of the present Applicant had been used for deposit of proceeds of fraud. The Applicant is working as a servant in a shop and he had no knowledge whatsoever that his Bank Account was being used for deposit of proceeds of fraud. The offences alleged against the present Applicant are triable by the court of M
The court denied bail due to the serious nature of the allegations and the applicant's prior involvement in similar fraudulent activities.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, gravity of accusations, and the applicant's compliance with conditions, emphasizing the balance between rights and the severity of charge....
The court denied bail due to substantial evidence of the applicant's involvement in serious offences, emphasizing the gravity of the charges.
The court emphasized that the role of the accused as a facilitator rather than a principal offender, alongside the absence of flight risk, justified the granting of bail under specified conditions.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless substantial risks are present.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
