SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 483

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
JYOTI D/O BHIMSINH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:KRUNAL S MEHTA(9227) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. The applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11201018240009 of 2024 registered with CID Cyber Crime, Police Station, District: Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Sections 388, 389, 342, 343, 466, 467, 471, 507, 120 of I.P.C. and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Krunal Mehta appearing for the applicant and learned APP Mr.Ronak Raval for the Respondent – State.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that in the present offence, investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The present applicant has been arrested in connection with the present offence on 18.6.2024 and since then the applicant is in custody. The present applicant is a lady aged around 26 years. The presence of the present applicant is no more required in the police custody for the purpose of investigation. He, therefore, submitted to allow the present application and enlarge the present applicant on bail subject to suitable conditions.

4. The application is opposed by learned APP for the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top