SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 444

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J,CMR
RATHAVA BACHUBHAI KHIMJI – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR BHARGAV HASURKAR(5640) ,Respondent Advocate: MUNJAAL M BHATT(8283)

ORDER :

(UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J.)

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner challenges under Article 226 of the Constitution of India a communication dated 11.07.2024, whereby his candidature has not been found to be eligible for RO Dealership on the basis of documents submitted by him for the reason that, ‘PAN card no. mismatch’, PAN card number shown in application form is not matching that PAN card copy submitted by the applicant.

2. The petitioner, pursuant to an advertisement brochure for selection of dealers for Regular and Rural Retail Outlets issued in June, 2023, applied for a Retail Outlet Dealership within 5 Kms of Petrol pump Chokdi, Chhotaudepur towards Surkheda on NH-56, Serial number of location in the advertisement to be 1103, which is submitted on 25.09.2023. Thereafter, as per the selection process through draw of lots, petitioner was provisionally selected for the Retail Outlet Dealership, as aforesaid. Therefore, petitioner was advised to submit Initial Security Deposit and specify documents through a communication dated 19.06.2024.

However, vide communication dated 11.07.2024, which is under challenge in this petition, petitioner came to be informed that his candidat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top