HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
RAVISHANKAR JAGANNATH BARIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11205047240539 of 2024 registered with Pragpar Police Station, District Kutchh (West) Bhuj.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant had actively participated in commission of offence. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.
5. Though served, nobody appeared for respondent original complainant.
6. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. Investigation is over and Charge-sheet has already been filed. The applicant herein happens to be brother of
The court granted bail based on the applicant's limited involvement in the offence and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the need for strict conditions to prevent interference with the....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody status and the nature of allegations, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure trial integrity.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's stable condition of the victim and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering and ensure trial atten....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody duration and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court emphasized the need for discretion in granting bail, considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's role, while ensuring conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's relationship with the victim, and the absence of flight risk, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure compliance during trial.
The court granted bail based on the prosecutrix's consent and lack of evidence suggesting flight risk or witness tampering.
The court established that bail may be granted considering the nature of the offence, prior custody duration, and the necessity of conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for discretion while imposing conditions to prevent interference with the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.