SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 392

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 5462 of 2025 ==========================================================
GURUBHAGATSINGH @ TITU S/O MAHENDRASINGH SINGH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VAIBHAV N SHETH(5337) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS. VRUNDA SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 19/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR VAIBHAV N SHETH(5337) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court established that bail may be granted considering the nature of the offence, prior custody duration, and the necessity of conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant, charged with serious offences related to contraband liquor, sought bail citing the nature of the offence and personal circumstances - The court considered the applicant's custody duration and lack of flight risk - The court emphasized the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and maintain law and order. (Paras 2, 5, 6, 7)

(B) Bail - Factors for consideration - The court outlined three key factors: prima facie case, availability of the accused during trial, and risk of tampering with witnesses - The court noted that the applicant had been in custody since December 21, 2024, and was not likely to flee. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of being the driver of a vehicle from which contraband liquor worth Rs.19 Lakhs was seized. The applicant has prior offences in Punjab and has been in custody since December 21, 2024.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant's release on bail was justified, subject to conditions to ensure compliance and prevent interference with the trial process.

Issues: The main issues included the seriousness of the charges, the applicant's prior criminal record, and the appropriateness of bail conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant's circumstances warranted bail, emphasizing the importance of conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and maintain order during the trial.

Result: Application allowed; applicant released on bail with conditions.

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11209041201453 of 2020 registered with Prantij Police Station, District Sabarkantha.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant is resident of Punjab. The applicant is having several other antecedents for commission of offence in the State of Punjab.the quantity of contraband liquor involved in the present offence is huge. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.

5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. Investigation is over and Charge-sheet has already been filed. As per the case of prosecution, the applicant herein happens to be driver of the vehicle from which the stock of contraband liquor worth Rs.19 Lakhs had been seized. Having regard to the same, the present application deserves to be allowed.

6. This court has also considered the following aspects:

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.

(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.

(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 21.12.2024.

(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made in the FIR and without discussing the evidence in details as well as without going into details, prima-facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with one Local surety of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that;

(a) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) shall maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) shall furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and to the Trial Court at the time of executing the bond and shall not change residence without prior permission of the trial Court.

(d) shall provide contact numbers as well as the contact numbers of the sureties before the Trial Court. In case of change in such numbers inform in writing immediately to the trial Court.

(e) shall file an affidavit stating immovable properties whether self acquired or ancestral with description, location and present value of such properties before the Trial Court, if any.

(f) shall not leave the territory of Gujarat State without prior permission of the Trial Court

(g) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week. If accused does not possess passport, shall file an Affidavit to that effect.

(h) shall mark presence before the concerned police station once in a month for a period of six months between 11:00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top