HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
KHUSH ASHOKBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191011240309 of 2024 registered with DCB Police Station, Ahmedabad City, Ahmedabad.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the present Applicant had supplied the counterfeit currency notes of Australian Dollars to the other co-accused and the said supply was with an intention to circulate the said counterfeit notes in the open market. Learned APP has therefore submitted that looking to the
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence against the Applicant and the consideration of bail conditions, emphasizing the importance of a prima facie case.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's reputation, duration of custody, and similarity to a co-accused's case, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance.
In the absence of substantial evidence linking the applicant to the alleged crime, bail may be granted, considering the applicant's compliance with conditions and lack of flight risk.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's lack of prior offenses and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing adherence to conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the Applicant to the offence, emphasizing the need for fair trial considerations.
The court denied bail based on the applicant's presence at the crime scene and the prosecution's evidence, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges under the BNS Act.
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's limited role in the alleged crime, good reputation, and absence of risk of flight or witness tampering.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's lack of prior criminal history and the nature of the allegations, imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail due to the completion of the investigation, lack of necessity for the applicant's presence, and no imminent trial, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of allegations ag....
The court granted bail under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for compliance and the importance of maintaining trial integrity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.