HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
RAVI JAYANTILAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with File No.DGGI/AZU/Gr.C/12(4)21/2024-25 at Ahmedabad under the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail. Learned APP submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.
5.1 Learned advocate Mr.Tirth Nayak for the respondent No.2 has opposed the present application contending that the
The court granted bail under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for compliance and the importance of maintaining trial integrity.
The court granted bail, emphasizing the applicant's readiness to deposit amounts and absence of flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail due to the completion of the investigation, lack of necessity for the applicant's presence, and no imminent trial, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of allegations ag....
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
The court established that bail may be granted when continued detention is unjustified, considering the nature of allegations and evidence presented.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, applicant's custody duration, and imposed conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court ruled that prolonged incarceration without trial progress warrants bail, emphasizing the importance of timely justice.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court established that bail can be granted by considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's reputation, and compliance with specific conditions to ensure trial integrity.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of the offence and the applicant's compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.