SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 661

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J,DNR
SULOCHANA V GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 10 – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) ,Respondent Advocate: MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802)

ORDER :

(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.)

1. This appeal is admitted by order dated 01/05/2009 on the following substantial questions of law:

“(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Tribunal has erred in law in holding that income (loss) of a minor son can only be clubbed in the income of the father i.e. Shri Vijay Kumar Gupta and not in the income of the mother i.e. the appellant herein as in the first A.Y., income of a minor son had been clubbed in the hands of father?

(ii)Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in interpreting the provisions of the s.64(1A) while holding that income of minor once included in the total income of the either parents will continue to be included in the income of the that very parent, unless the AO is satisfied, after giving that parent an opportunity of being heard, that it is necessary so to do?”

2. The appellant filed return of income for the assessment year 1997-1998 on 29/10/1997 declaring total income of Rs.4,30,556/-.

3. The case of the appellant was selected for scrutiny. As the appellant claimed set-off of loss of minor son amounting to Rs.7,55,041/-, the same was subject

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top