SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 720

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION) NO. 251 of 2024 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 3 of 2024 In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 251 of 2024 ==========================================================
PARTHIJI MAFAJI THAKOR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI Date : 19/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Bail granted based on time served and nature of injuries, with conditions to ensure compliance with law.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 326 - Criminal Revision Application - Regular bail application during pendency of revision against conviction and sentence - Applicant sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with fine - Application for bail allowed considering nature of injuries and time served in custody. (Paras 2, 3, 5)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Applicant released on bail with conditions to maintain law and order and not to misuse liberty. (Paras 5)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is seeking regular bail during the pendency of a revision application against a conviction for causing grievous hurt, sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and a fine. The applicant has been in jail for over a year. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the nature of injuries and the time already served warranted the granting of bail. (Paras 5)

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the nature of the injuries and the time spent in custody. (Paras 3)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the applicant's time in custody and the nature of the injuries, bail should be granted with appropriate conditions to ensure compliance with law. (Paras 5)

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

(PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.)

ORDER IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION: 

Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent – State.

ORDER IN CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 3 OF 2024:

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent – State.

2. By way of present application, the applicant – accused is praying to release him on regular bail during pendency of the present revision application preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 13.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deesa in Criminal Case No. 576 of 2008, which came to be confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.1.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2021, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa has sentenced the applicant to undergo simple imprisonment of 7 years under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code with fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo further simple imprisonment of 6 months.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the Criminal Revision Application is of the year 2024 and it will take some time to hear the revision application at final hearing stage. The applicant is in jail for more than one year. Considering the nature of injury and also the nature of allegations, role attributed to the applicant the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. The applicant has a good case on merits and hence, the order of the sentence may be suspended and the applicant may be released on regular bail on appropriate terms and condition.

4. Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has objected to the present application to grant regular bail and has submitted that the order of sentence is just and proper and no interference is required in the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa confirming the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deesa and hence, present application may be rejected.

5. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and perused the document produced on record. Looking to the nature of injuries and more particularly the applicant has already undergone one year of incarceration, the application is required to be allowed and is hereby allowed and thereby, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court and on the following conditions:

(a) shall not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) shall not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of this Court.

(c) shall furnish the present address of his residence to the Court concerned at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without the prior permission of the Court

(d) shall maintain law and order.

(e) shall not indulge in any activity leading to breach of public peace and tranquility.

6. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of as allowed.

Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.  

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top