SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 882

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 156 of 2025 ==========================================================
VASANTBHAI RAMESHBHAI VADODARIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR TUSHAR L SHETH(3920) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 26/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR TUSHAR L SHETH(3920) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court held that the failure of the complainant to prove a legally enforceable debt justified the suspension of the applicant's sentence pending revision.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 438 and 442 - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Quashing of conviction - Applicant challenged conviction for dishonor of cheque, arguing that the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt and that the trial court erred in its assessment of evidence. (Paras 2, 3)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Revision Application - The court considered the merits of the case and granted interim relief, suspending the sentence pending the revision application, subject to conditions including the deposit of the remaining compensation amount. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- to the complainant. The conviction was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant had a good case for revision and granted interim relief, allowing bail upon certain conditions.

Issues: The main issues included whether the complainant proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the appropriateness of the trial court's conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's arguments regarding the failure of the complainant to prove the case warranted a reconsideration of the conviction, leading to the suspension of the sentence.

Result: Sentence suspended and bail granted.

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. By way of this application under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 04.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot, in Criminal Case No.4258/2016, whereby the Trial Court has been pleased to held the applicant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act and sentenced to undergo SI of one year and also directed to pay Rs.6,00,000/- towards compensation to the original complainant, in default to pay, to undergo further SI for one yearl, as well as order dated 09.01.2025 by which learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, dismissed Criminal Appeal No.77/2019 and confirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned trial Court. Hence, this Revision Application is filed.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has taken this Court through the factual matrix arising out of the present application and submitted that, the both the courts below have erred in recording conviction though the complainant failed to prove his case. Further, the learned Courts below failed to appreciate the evidence in its true perspective though the complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt and the defense made by the complainant was not properly examined by the trial Court. Further, the accused has rebutted presumption and complainant has failed to prove case against the applicant. Considering the aforesaid facts, the applicant has good case and arguable case. Even without entering into merit of the case, the applicant has submitted that, the applicant is in custody. However, the applicant has deposited Rs.60,000/- before the trial Court and now is ready and willing to deposit remaining amount of Rs.5,40,000/- with the learned trial Court if the sentence imposed against the applicant is suspended pending the present criminal revision application.

4. Considering the aforesaid facts, subject to the applicant depositing Rs.5,40,000/- with the learned trial Court within a week, issue NOTICE making it returnable on 02.05.2025. Learned APP waives service of Notice for and on behalf of respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

5. Pending the present criminal revision application, interim relief in terms of paragraph No.8(c) is granted and sentence imposed upon the applicant vide impugned judgment dated 04.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot, in Criminal Case No.4258/2016, as well as order dated 09.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, in Criminal Appeal No.77/2019 are suspended and the applicant shall be released on bail by executing a fresh bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, on conditions that applicant:-

(a) shall not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) shall not leave India without prior permission of this Court.

(c) shall furnish the present address of his residence to the Court concerned at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without the prior permission of this Court.

(d) shall proceed with the Criminal Revision Application as and when listed and shall not prolong the hearing of the same.

6. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

Direct service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top