Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
PRANAV TRIVEDI
Rakeshbhai Ambalal Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.)
[1] The present revision application is filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") challenging the judgment and order dated 21.06.2013 passed in Criminal Appeal No.25 of 2013 below Exhibit '7' by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nadiad, District - Kheda (hereinafter referred to as "the appellate court").
[2] The brief facts resulting into filing of the present revision application are that it was the case of the revisionist - applicant that he has issued a cheque worth Rs.1,65,000/- to the complainant, i.e., respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent"), which was dishonored. This has led to filing of a complaint under the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The complaint came to be filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kapadvanj (hereinafter referred to as "the trial court"). The case came to be registered as Criminal Case No.2092 of 2007 and the process came to be issued. Pursuant to the issuance of the process, the plea of applicant was recorded below Exhibit '7' and the
The appellate court erred in ordering a de novo trial as the proceedings were not conducted as a summary trial, violating the provisions of the Code.
Dishonour of cheque – When evidence of parties, in chief examination, cross-examination and re-examination (if any) were recorded in verbatim and was faithfully placed on record then for merely not r....
Point of law : Though as per section 16-A of the PFA all offence under section 16(1) are to be tried by the Magistrate of First Class so empowered summarily, departure from this procedure can be made....
Procedural irregularities in trials under the Negotiable Instruments Act do not invalidate judgments unless they cause prejudice to the parties involved; trial integrity must prioritize substantive j....
A de novo trial is not warranted when evidence is recorded in a summons case format, as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial court's decision to try the complaint case as a summons case was justified based on the nature of the case and the possibility of a ....
Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act affirmed, emphasizing the necessity of due process in criminal trials and the validity of a Magistrate's authority.
The court has the discretion to alter the sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act based on the circumstances and payment made by the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
