SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 764

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
APM
M/S DHARTI ZINC – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ARJUN R SHETH(7589) ,Respondent Advocate: MR MANISH S SHAH(5859)

ORDER :

(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.) 

1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners pray for an appropriate direction to quash and set aside the declaration of the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud under the RBI Circular, declared on 12.4.2021 in FIR No.RC0572022S0001 dated 27.3.2022.

2. Learned counsel Mr. Arjun Sheth appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners were never issued any show cause notice nor any opportunity of hearing was accorded to the petitioners before declaring the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud on 12.4.2021. Mr. Sheth submits that it appears that the respondent Bank has relied upon the Forensic Audit Report dated 12.3.2020 given by M/s. R.K. Doshi & Co. LLP before arriving at such an adverse conclusion against the petitioners. Mr. Sheth submits that the respondent Bank has not supplied any material, including the Forensic Audit Report, to the petitioners before declaring the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud account. In support of his submissions, Mr. Sheth relies upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State Bank of India and Others v. Rajesh Agarwal and Others reported in (2023) 6 SCC 1, wherein it has been held that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top