HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
APM
M/S DHARTI ZINC – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER :
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners pray for an appropriate direction to quash and set aside the declaration of the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud under the RBI Circular, declared on 12.4.2021 in FIR No.RC0572022S0001 dated 27.3.2022.
2. Learned counsel Mr. Arjun Sheth appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners were never issued any show cause notice nor any opportunity of hearing was accorded to the petitioners before declaring the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud on 12.4.2021. Mr. Sheth submits that it appears that the respondent Bank has relied upon the Forensic Audit Report dated 12.3.2020 given by M/s. R.K. Doshi & Co. LLP before arriving at such an adverse conclusion against the petitioners. Mr. Sheth submits that the respondent Bank has not supplied any material, including the Forensic Audit Report, to the petitioners before declaring the account of petitioner No.1 as fraud account. In support of his submissions, Mr. Sheth relies upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State Bank of India and Others v. Rajesh Agarwal and Others reported in (2023) 6 SCC 1, wherein it has been held that the
The principle of Audi Alteram Partem must be applied before classifying an account as fraud under RBI guidelines, ensuring borrowers are given a fair opportunity to be heard.
The principle of audi alteram partem, requiring lender banks to provide an opportunity for borrowers to submit a representation before classifying their accounts as fraud, in line with the principles....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rule of audi alteram partem should be read into the Master Directions on Fraud, requiring lender banks to provide an opportunity of hearin....
The court established that borrowers must be given an opportunity to present their case before their accounts are classified as fraudulent as part of adhering to natural justice principles.
The principle of audi alteram partem, requiring the lender banks to provide an opportunity of hearing to the borrowers before classifying their accounts as fraud, was central to the court's decision.
Natural justice principles demand notice and opportunity for personal hearing before classifying bank accounts as fraud, ensuring that parties have the chance to defend their rights against severe pe....
The court established that the principles of natural justice require that a borrower be given notice and an opportunity to respond before their account is classified as fraud.
Adherence to the principles of natural justice requires personal hearings for borrowers before classifying bank accounts as fraudulent.
Borrowers must be given a hearing before their accounts are classified as fraudulent to uphold principles of natural justice.
The classification of an account as fraud must adhere to principles of natural justice, including providing a reasoned order and opportunity to be heard.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.