SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO, J.
State of Gujarat - Appellant
Versus
Thakor Dashrathji Talaji - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1360 of 2008
Decided On : 02-04-2025

Advocate Appeared:
Petitioner Advocates: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)
Respondent Advocate: MR DK CHAUDHARI(5361)

The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence of abetment for conviction under Section 306 IPC.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 378(1)(3) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A, 306, and 201 - Appeal against acquittal - The learned Trial Court acquitted the accused of all charges, finding insufficient evidence of harassment or abetment leading to suicide. The appeal was filed by the State challenging the acquittal, arguing that the evidence supported the prosecution's case. (Paras 1, 3, 12)

(B) Acquittal Appeals - The appellate court has the power to review and reappreciate evidence but must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's reasonable conclusions. An acquittal should not be disturbed unless the trial court's view is unreasonable or perverse. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The accused were related to the deceased, who committed suicide after alleged harassment. The prosecution's evidence was deemed insufficient to establish abetment or harassment. (Paras 2.1, 11)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's acquittal was justified due to lack of evidence supporting the prosecution's claims. (Paras 12)

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in acquitting the accused based on the evidence presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court upheld the trial court's findings, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of abetment for a conviction under Section 306 IPC. (Paras 12)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(S. V. PINTO, J.)

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant- State under Section 378 (1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Patan (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Sessions Case No. 39 of 2007 on 11.01.2008, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 for the offence for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A , 306 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ) and also acquitted the accused No. 1 from the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC.

1.1] Learned APP has produced the report of Police Inspector V.J. Parmar, In-charge Police Inspector Chanasma Police Station, District: Patan mainly stating that respondent No. 3 Balaji Talaji Thakor has expired on 22-09-2013 during the pendency of the appeal and a copy of the death certificate along with the statements of Badevji @ Bijalji Talaji Thakur, Viramji Talaji Thakor and Shaileshji Balaji Thakor have been produced and the report is taken on record. As per the death certificate, respondent No. 3 - Balaji Talaji Thakor has expired on 22-09-2013 and the copy of the death certificate, wherein the death has been registered in the Births and Deaths register with the Talati-cum-Mantri, Etoda Gram Panchayat, Taluka Chansma; District Patan is produced. In view of the above, the appeal qua respondent No. 3 stands abated.

1.1 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as “the accused” as they stood in the rank and file in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.

2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:

2.1] The accused No.1 Dashrathji Talaji Thakor was married to Jebarben more than 10 years prior to the incident. The accused No.3 is the elder brother-in-law of the accused No.1 and the accused Nos. 2 and 4 are the younger brothers of the accused No.1 and all the 3 accused were the brothers-in-law of Jebarben. The accused No.1 would not do any work and whenever Jebarben would tell him to do some work, he would get angry and physically and mentally harass Jebarben and the accused Nos. 2 to 4 would abet in the harassment. On 18th May 2007, Jebarben was so fed up with the harassment that she sprinkled kerosene on her body and set herself ablaze and committed suicide. The complaint was filed by her brother Sawaji Bajuji Thakor at Chanasma Police Station under Sections 306, 201 and 114 of the IPC , which was registered at Chanasma Police Station being I-C.R.No.62 of 2007.

2.2] The Investigating Officer recorded the statements of the connected witnesses and collected the necessary documents and after completion of investigation the police filed the chargesheet against the accused before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chanasma and as the said offences against the accused were exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, the case was committed to the Sessions Court, Patan as per the provisions of Section 209 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the case was registered Sessios Case No. 39 of 2007.

2.3] The accused were duly served with the summons and the accused appeared before the learned Trial Court, and it was verified whether the copies of all the police papers were provided to the accused as per the provisions of Section 207 of the Code. A charge at Exh. 16 was framed against the accused and the statements of the accused were recorded at Exhs. 17 to 21, wherein, the accused denied all the contents of the charge and the entire evidence of the prosecution was taken on record.

2.4] The prosecution produced eight oral evidences and eleven documentary evidences to bring home the charge against the accused and after the learned Additional Public Prosecutor filed the closing pursis, the further statement of the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were recorded, wherein, the accused denied all the evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top