IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V.PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Rakeshbhai Dulabhai Baraiya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant- State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Sessions Case No. 189 of 2007 on 23.05.2011, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 452 , 306, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and Section 135 of the BOMBAY POLICE ACT .
1.1 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as “the accused” as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1] On 30.05.2005, the complainant, Ashwinbhai Balabhai Solanki and his younger brother Ravi were at home and his parents and elder brother Raju and younger sister Poonam had gone out. At around 12.30 hours, the accused came armed with a stick, which was in the hands of the accused No. 1 and came into their house and asked them where their brother Raju was. The accused threatened them and told them to vacate the house and go away
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must uphold the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's decision lacks a reasonable basis and is perverse.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence of abetment for conviction under Section 306 IPC.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and will not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable.
The appellate court confirmed the acquittal, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and reinforcing the presumption of innocence for the accused.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless they are unreasonable or perverse, particularly in acquittal appeals.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of proving abetment of suicide beyond reasonable doubt.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable or perverse.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and not disturb an acquittal if plausible evidence supports the trial court's findings. Evidence of direct causatio....
The appellate court emphasized that to convict under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or direct involvement in facilitating suicide is essential; mere allegations are inadequate.
In acquittal appeals, unless strong reasons exist, courts maintain respect for the trial court's judgment when reasonable conclusions are possible, preserving the presumption of innocence for the acc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.