HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.V. PINTO
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Kishorbhai Khodabhai Bhatti – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Sessions Case No. 93 of 2008 on 09-01-2009, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 188 (hereafter referred to as "Atrocities Act" for short).
1.1 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as the accused in the rank and file as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1 On 27th May, 2008 at around 09:30 pm, the complainant Rajeshbhai Govindbhai Makwana (Vankar) went into Chandan Hair Art for a hair cut and at that time, the accused No. 1 abused him with casteslurs and refused to give him a hair cut and asked him to leave the shop. Mansukhbhai Badhabhai Dafda, Mohanbhai Chanabhai Makwana and Bhalabhai Muljibhai Sarvaiya were also
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of substantial evidence in cases of alleged caste discrimination.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal cases but should not interfere unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but should not reverse a trial court's acquittal unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse.
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and should not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable or unsupported by evidence.
An appellate court has broad powers to review evidence in acquittal appeals but should exercise caution, respecting the presumption of innocence unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere with an acquittal unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse.
In acquittal appeals, presumption of innocence is reinforced, and the appellate court should only interfere with the acquittal if the trial court's ruling is perverse or unreasonable based on the pre....
An appeal against acquittal should respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere if the acquittal is based on reasonable conclusions drawn from evidence.
In acquittal appeals, the presumption of innocence favors the accused, limiting the appellate court's interference unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or lacks proper evidence.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.