SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 868

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21906 of 2023 ==========================================================
RUPANI SHAHINFATIMA ASAGARALI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MAQBULAHMED A SAIYED(8429) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR ROMESH C NIVEN(9064) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR MAYANK CHAVDA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR KIRTIDEV R DAVE(3267) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR RAHUL K DAVE(3978) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE Date : 26/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:ROMESH C NIVEN(9064) ,Respondent Advocate: ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99)

The court affirmed that a birth certificate must be amended to reflect the adoptive father's name post-adoption, recognizing the high evidentiary value of registered documents.

Headnote:(A) Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Section 15 - Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004 - Writ petition for correction of father's name in birth certificate post-adoption - Authority's rejection of application for name change challenged - Birth certificate holds high evidentiary value and must reflect legal changes post-adoption. (Paras 4, 7, 8)

(B) Adoption - Legal recognition of adoption necessitates updating of birth records to reflect the adoptive parent's name - A registered document carries presumptive value and must be corrected to align with legal realities. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, after divorcing Hasan Serali Lakhani, remarried Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali and adopted her daughter Khwahise Zehara. An application to change the father's name in the birth certificate was rejected by the authority.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the birth certificate, being a statutory document, must be amended to reflect the adoptive father's name following legal adoption.

Issues: The main issues were whether the authority had the power to change the father's name in the birth certificate post-adoption and the evidentiary value of the birth certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the birth certificate must be amended to reflect the adoptive father's name, emphasizing the presumptive value of registered documents and the necessity of updating records post-adoption.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

1. Rule returnable forthwith. The learned counsels for the respective respondents waive service of rule.

2. The present writ petition is filed praying for the following reliefs:-

“A. YOUR LORDSHIPS MAY BE PLEASED to admit and allow the present petition in the interest of justice.

B. YOUR LORDSHIPS MAY BE PLEASED to quash and set aside the impugned order/communication Dt:-24.11.2023 passed by the respondent no:-2 in interest of Justice.

C. YOUR LORDSHIPS MAY BE PLEASED to direct the respondent No:2 to make necessary correction in the name of the father from HASAN SERALI LAKHANI to RUPANI ASGARALI SHABBIRALI in birth certificate of daughter namely KHWAHISE ZEHARA; in interest of Justice.

D. YOUR LORDSHIPS MAY BE PLEASED to grant such other and further relief that may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner got married with one Hasan Serali Lakhani on 24.05.2015 and that during their marriage life, the petitioner delivered a baby girl viz. Khwahise Zehara on 25.08.2017. It is submitted that the daughter of the petitioner was born at Mundra, District Kuchchh and therefore, her birth is registered at Mundra Gram Panchayat District Kuchchh and accordingly, the birth certificate is also issued. Thereafter, the marriage life of the petitioner with Hasan Serali Lakhani did not survive and she got divorce. Thereafter, the petitioner remarried to one Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali on 21.05.2023 and they also executed an adoption deed on 07.11.2023 for adopting the daughter of the petitioner, which was duly registered at the office of Sub-Registrar, Vejalpur, Ahmedabad. It is submitted that thereafter, the petitioner made an application dated 20.11.2023 to the respondent No.2 for changing the name of father in the birth certificate of her daughter, which came to be rejected on 24.11.2023. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the daughter of the petitioner be directed to be changed in the birth certificate from “Hasan Serali Lakhani” to “Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali”.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that in view of Section 15 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004, the authority does not have the power to change the name of father.

5. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the documents on record.

6. It is not disputed that the petitioner got divorce from Hasan Serali Lakhani and remarried to Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali and thereafter, the petitioner and said Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali have legally adopted the daughter of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner made an application dated 20.11.2023 to the respondent No.2 for changing the name of father in the birth certificate of her daughter, however, it came to be rejected on 24.11.2023.

7. The Birth Certificate as produced by the petitioner is a statutory certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat and has a very high evidentiary value. The name of daughter of the petitioner in the Birth Certificate has been recorded as per the statutory provisions under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Further, after adoption, the name of father of daughter of the petitioner is required to be corrected. It is settled position of law that a registered document has presumptive value.

8. In view of the submissions made and for the above-mentioned reasons, the writ petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. The respondent No.2 is directed to change the name of father of daughter of the petitioner in the Birth Certificate from “Hasan Serali Lakhani” to “Rupani Asgarali Shabbirali”. There shall be no order as to costs.

Direct Service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top