SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1407

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Nirzar S. Desai, J.
Chandrikaben Bharatkumar Patel – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Gujarat & others – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 20140 of 2021
Decided On : 26-09-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr Tejas P Satta
For the Respondent: Mr Hardik Mehta AGP

The legal framework under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004 empowers the authorities to make corrections in birth records based on documentary evidence.

Headnote:

Birth Certificate Correction - Change of Name and Date of Birth - Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to change her name and date of birth in her birth record, providing evidence such as School Leaving Certificate, Pan Card, Driving License, Aadhar Card, Election Card, and Passport. The respondent rejected the application citing a government resolution, which was subsequently cancelled.

Finding of the Court:

The court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondent authority to process the application as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Act read with Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Birth and Death Rules, 2004, considering all the documentary evidence provided by the petitioner.

Issues: The main issue was the correction of the petitioner's name and date of birth in her birth record.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 and Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004, which empower the authorities to make corrections in the register of Births and Deaths based on documentary evidence.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the respondent authority was directed to process the application for correction within four weeks, with the option for the petitioner to challenge any adverse decision before the appropriate forum.

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 18.06.2021 passed by the Respondent No.3 and has further prayed for changing the name of petitioner in her birth record as “Chandrikaben” from “Chandraben” and the date of birth of the petitioner from “03.12.1967” to “01.06.1967”.

2. Considering the short issue on hand by consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. Hence, Rule. Learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State Authorities. As far as Respondent No.3 is concerned, despite the service of notice Respondent No.3 has not appeared. The Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are competent to direct Respondent No.3 to pass necessary orders pursuant to the order passed by this Court and, therefore, even in absence of Respondent No.3 matter was heard finally.

3.1 It is the case of the petitioner that actual date of birth of the petitioner is ‘01.06.1967’ whereas in the column no.3 of birth certificate of the petitioner, it is wrongly stated as 03.12.1967. Similarly, the actual name of the petitioner viz. Chandrikaben whereas in the birth certificate her name is stated as ‘Chandraben’.

3.2 In support of her claim for making necessary correction, the petitioner has placed on record the documents like School Leaving Certificate, Pan Card, Driving License, Aadhar Card, Election Card as well as her Passport.

3.3 When the petitioner made an application dated 14.06.2021 with the aforesaid documents to the respondent no.3 authorities, the respondent no.3 authority, vide order dated 18.06.2021, rejected the application of the petitioner by stating that in view of Government Resolution dated 12.08.2009 it is not permissible to make necessary change in the birth record and, therefore, rejected the application of the petitioner.

4.1 However, upon instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Hardik Mehta states that vide office order dated 21.02.2021 subsequently the aforesaid Government Resolution dated 12.08.2009 has been cancelled.

4.2 In view of above, considering the fact that present applicant is having all necessary documents in support of her change of date of birth as i.e.01.06.1967 and her name in her birth record as “Chandrikaben” from “Chandraben” learned Assistant Government Pleader states that appropriate order be passed.

5. At this stage, it would be apposite to refer to the observations made by the Coordinate Bench in the order dated 05.12.2012 passed in Special Civil Application No.8556 of 2012:

    “7. Section 15 of the Act, the Registrar has power for correction or cancellation of entry in the Register of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Section 15 of the Act reads as under:

“15. Correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths.—If it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of a birth or death in any register kept by him under this Act is erroneous in form or substance, or has been fraudulently or improperly made, he may, subject to such rules as may be made by the State Government with respect to the conditions on which and the circumstances in which such entries may be corrected or cancelled correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation.”

8. Rule 11 of the Gujarat Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2004 relates to correction or cancellation of entry in the Register of Births and Deaths, reads as under:

“(1) If it is reported to the Register that a clerical or formal error has been made in the register or if such error is otherwise noticed by him and if the register is in his possession, the Registrar shall inquire into the matter and if he is satisfied that any such error has been made, he shall correct the error (by correcting or cancelling the entry) as provid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top