SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 896

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
DINESH MADANBHAI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. The Applicants have filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11204025250071 of 2025 registered with Kheda Town Police Station, Kheda.

2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

3. After arguing the matter, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Application, qua applicant No.1. The Permission as prayed for is granted. The matter stands disposed of as withdrawn, qua applicant No.1.

4. The present Application is thereafter confined to applicant Nos.2 to 5, only.

5. Rule, qua applicant Nos.2 to 5. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.

6. Learned Advocate arguing on behalf of Applicant Nos.2 to 5 has submitted that the other applicants are mere labourers and had come from Rajasthan for doing labour work and had been apprehended in the present offence. He has further submitted that the Applicants have good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the Applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is further c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top