HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
DINESH MADANBHAI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Applicants have filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11204025250071 of 2025 registered with Kheda Town Police Station, Kheda.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
3. After arguing the matter, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Application, qua applicant No.1. The Permission as prayed for is granted. The matter stands disposed of as withdrawn, qua applicant No.1.
4. The present Application is thereafter confined to applicant Nos.2 to 5, only.
5. Rule, qua applicant Nos.2 to 5. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
6. Learned Advocate arguing on behalf of Applicant Nos.2 to 5 has submitted that the other applicants are mere labourers and had come from Rajasthan for doing labour work and had been apprehended in the present offence. He has further submitted that the Applicants have good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the Applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is further c
The court granted bail to applicants based on their role as labourers in a contraband case, emphasizing the balance between the gravity of allegations and the rights of the accused.
The court granted bail considering the Applicant's lack of prior criminal record and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of specific conditions to ensure compliance during trial....
The court granted bail based on the Applicants' good reputation and compliance willingness, despite serious charges, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail conditions.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's lack of prior offenses and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing adherence to conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the completion of the investigation, imposing conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court emphasized the importance of assessing bail applications based on the nature of allegations, prior conduct, and the applicant's likelihood of appearing for trial.
In the absence of substantial evidence linking the applicant to the alleged crime, bail may be granted, considering the applicant's compliance with conditions and lack of flight risk.
The court emphasized that prolonged custody without trial progress and lack of flight risk justifies granting bail, subject to specific conditions.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's lack of prior criminal history and the nature of the allegations, imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.