Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
BHARAT KHODABHAI GADHAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's good reputation (Para 4) |
| 3. opposition by learned app (Para 5) |
| 4. investigation status (Para 6) |
| 5. factors for bail consideration (Para 7) |
| 6. bail granted with conditions (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. breach of conditions (Para 10) |
| 8. trial court's independence (Para 11) |
| 9. rule made absolute (Para 12) |
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that there is another antecedents against the present applicant for commission of similar nature of offences. The present applicant was proposed to received the stock of contraband liquor involved in the present offence. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.
7. This court has considered the following aspects:
(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not like
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the completion of the investigation, imposing conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail based on the Applicants' good reputation and compliance willingness, despite serious charges, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail conditions.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's lack of prior criminal record and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the importance of maintaining law and order during bail condition....
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence against the Applicant and the absence of prior criminal history, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance.
The court established that bail may be granted based on the assessment of prima facie case, custody duration, and risk of tampering with evidence, with conditions imposed to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of allegations, highlighting the need for a balanced approach in bail considerations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
