IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Natvarbhai @ Balyo Ramanbhai Dantani (Vaghri) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal filed under Sections 378(1)((3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14.03.2008 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No.195 of 2007. The offence was registered under Sections 498A, 306 read with Section 114 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’). The FIR was registered at Vejalpur Police Station and after the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed.
2. The incident had occurred on 09.11.2006 at about 1.00 in the afternoon, where the victim deceased - Sunitaben committed suicide by hanging herself with the ‘Duptta’, tied on her neck attached to the pipe of the ceiling of the matrimonial house. The allegation is that the cause of suicide is the mental and physical cruelty meted at the hands of the accused, who are husband, younger brother-in-law and mother-in-law. The father of the deceased Bhanubhai Bhulabhai Chunara gave the complaint on 11.11.2006 at about 19:55 in the evening.
3. Learned APP Mr. Rohan H. Raval has submitted that the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judge is contrary to the law and evidence on record. The prose
The presumption of innocence prevails in acquittal cases; mere suicide within seven years of marriage does not establish guilt without proof of cruelty or dowry demand.
The presumption of abetment of suicide under Section 113A cannot be applied without proof of cruelty or dowry demand, and the acquittal of the accused was upheld due to insufficient evidence.
Court emphasized the necessity of establishing clear evidence of cruelty to invoke presumption of abetment of suicide under Section 113A of the Evidence Act, reinforcing the presumption of innocence ....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in cases of acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for reliable evidence linking alleged cruelty to suicide.
The presumption of innocence, the need for clear evidence to prove guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal unless it is perverse or unsustainable in law.
In acquittal appeals, the prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, with particular emphasis on direct evidence of instigation to suicide under Section 306 IPC.
The appellate court reaffirmed that acquittal carries a double presumption of innocence, emphasizing the requirement of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, with significant evidence contradictio....
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of respondents due to insufficient evidence of cruelty and abetment of suicide, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substa....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; acquittal is upheld when evidence does not convincingly establish guilt.
The presumption of abetment under Section 113A of the Evidence Act does not apply automatically; the prosecution must prove cruelty to establish guilt under Sections 306 and 498A IPC.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.