IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
Katariya Usmangani Hajibhai Trustee of Hazrat Jalalshah Pir Dargah Trust - Petitioner
Versus
State of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 1529 of 2025
Decided On : 02-04-2025
(A) National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 3A and 3B - Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Unauthorized construction on Government waste land acquired for National Highway - The petitioner, a trustee of a Dargah, sought to quash a demolition order for a structure under construction, claiming it was necessary to prevent water damage. The court found the land was Government waste land and had been acquired for the National Highway, thus the construction was unauthorized. (Paras 1, 3, 7, 12)
(B) Public Interest - The court emphasized that public safety and traffic flow on the National Highway take precedence over the petitioner's claims of historical significance and usage of the land as a graveyard. (Paras 9, 12)
(C) Discrimination Claim - The court rejected the claim of discriminatory treatment, noting the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of bias against the authorities. (Paras 9, 10)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner Trust sought to renovate a Dargah/Mazar situated on Government waste land, claiming historical significance and necessity due to water damage. The authorities issued a demolition notice citing unauthorized construction on acquired land.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the demolition order, stating the construction was unauthorized and posed a public safety risk.
Issues: The main issues included the legality of the construction on Government land and claims of discrimination against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner Trust had no legal right to the land, which was Government waste land acquired for the National Highway, and public safety concerns outweighed the Trust's claims.
Result: The Special Civil Application is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Special Civil Application has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
“10(A) THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO admit and allow this petition by issuing the writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 27th January, 2025 issued by the respondent no.2 annexed as Annexure-A.
(B) Pending admission and final hearing of this petitioner, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay the execution, implementation and further operation of impugned order dated 27th January, 2025 issued by the respondent no.2. annexed as Annexure-A.”
2. The brief facts of the present case are that, the petitioner is a trustee of the Hazrat Jalal Shah Pir Dargah Trust [“Trust” for short]. That the said Dargah/Mazar is constructed on the grave of Sufi Saint Hazrat Jalal Shah Pir which is integral part of the kabristan of muslims of Anandpar Village and some of surrounding villagers. That the Dargah/Mazar on the grave of the said Sufi Saint was constructed and renovated from time to time in order to preserve it. The said Dargah/Mazar has lots of devotees and annual Urs is also being conducted and celebrated there. That the said Dargah/Mazar is registered as Wakf Estate bearing Waqf ID GJ031348 and Aukaf register Sr. No.031148 which is registered on 26.03.1963. The said Dargah/Mazar is in existence since ancient time and has historical significance. That the said Dargah/Mazar is situated on the Rajkot-Ahmedabad National Highway No.27. The said Dargah/Mazar is clearly separated by the service road as well as is 15 feet away from the main highway. That due to construction of National Highway and other surrounding developments, the Dargah/Mazar and surrounding area became uneven creating a descending flow from the highway towards the Dargah/Mazar and due to such condition, during monsoon, the water flows from the road and enters in the Dargah/Mazar. Therefore, the Trust decided to renovate the Dargah/Mazar and to construct the proper flooring and structure so that the grave of the Sufi Saint can be prevented from the damage. For the said purpose, necessary permission was sought from Shri Anandpar (Navagam) Gram Panchayat and the permission came to be granted by the said Gram Panchayat vide letter dated 03.04.2024. That the construction is about to get completed and during such process, no hindrance or disturbance has been caused by any person and all the necessary safety precautions have been taken to ensure that there no disturbance to the traffic of the highway as might be caused. That the notice dated 09.01.2025 came to be issued by the respondent No.2 Dy. Executive Engineer. Thereafter, subsequently, the respondent No.2 Dy. Executive Engineer issued a subsequent notice dated 18.01.2025 to remove the structure under construction. That thereafter the petitioner made a detailed representation on 24.01.2025 which came to be decided by the order dated 27.01.2025.
Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the present Special Civil Application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Dargah/Mazar is an ancient structure. The said Dargah/Mazar is registered as Wakf Estate bearing Waqf ID GJ031348 and Aukaf register Sr. No.031148 on 26.03.1963. The said Dargah/Mazar is also registered under the Public Trust Act having serial No.B-148. The said Dargah/Mazar is also allotted PAN No.AADTH0545E by the Income Tax Department. Being the shrine of Sufi Saint Hazrat Jalal Shah Pir Valiullah, it has its own significance and has a history of more than 100 years. He submits that the said Dargah/Mazar is situated near the National Highway No.27, but it is at a distance of several feet from the boundary of the last lane of the said Highway and is separated by service road as well as open space of more than 15 feet. He submits that due to the construction of the National Highway and other surrounding developments, the surface of the said Dargah/Mazar and surrounding area beca
Public safety and adherence to land acquisition laws take precedence over claims of historical significance in unauthorized construction cases.
Writ jurisdiction cannot enlarge scope beyond original prayers or adjudicate intricate title disputes over acquired government land; challenges to acquisition or title via statutory remedies like s.3....
A property claimed as waqf must be registered; unregistered claims do not confer ownership rights, especially when encroaching on public land.
The court established that extraordinary jurisdiction is not a substitute for civil law remedies in property disputes, especially when public safety is at stake.
The need for evidence of running an educational institution, ownership, and permission for construction, and the public interest in acquired land.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.