Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
Jitendra Chimanlal Parikh Power of Attorney -Holder of – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kantilal Mehta Prop., Shree Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – original complainant under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 18.08.2005 in Criminal Case No.705 of 2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balasinor (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondent No.1 – original accused from the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The parties are hereinafter referred to as ‘the complainant’ and ‘the accused’ as they stood in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:
2.1. That the complainant had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the accused as the accused had given cheque No.301223 drawn on the Bank of Baroda, Mangaldas Market, Mumbai Branch and the complainant had deposited the same in Balasinor Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Balasinor Branch on 17.07.2000. but, the said cheque was returned w
The presumption of innocence is reinforced upon acquittal, and appellate courts must not interfere unless the trial court's findings are unreasonable or flawed.
The appellate court has the authority to review evidence in acquittal appeals, but must respect the presumption of innocence and ensure that any findings against the accused are based on substantial ....
The appellate court must respect trial court findings of acquittal unless substantial errors are demonstrated, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence is reinforced in acquittal cases, with the burden of proof on the complainant to establish the enforceable debt and financial capacity.
An appellate court reviewing a trial court's acquittal must respect the presumption of innocence unless the judgment demonstrates clear and manifest errors in the consideration of evidence.
Point of law : Presumption Under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of p....
In an appeal against acquittal, the prosecution must demonstrate a legally enforceable debt; an accused's acquittal will not be disturbed unless clear illegality or absurdity is shown.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
