Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
RAKESH BALVANTRAM JARIWALA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA CORPORATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant-original complainant under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (“Cr.P.C.” for short) against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.1.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court-1, Surat (hereinafter be referred to as “the trial Court”) in Criminal Case No. 491 of 2003, whereby the trial Court has acquitted the respondents accused persons for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (“N.I. Act” for short).
2. The facts giving rise to present appeal are that the complainant is doing business of manufacturing gray cloths and the respondent no. 1 is a Firm doing business as Shroff and Commission Agent and the respondents-2 and 3 are the partners of the said firm.
2.1 The complainant was receiving the payment by cheques from the parties to whom he was selling his cloths and for the need of immediate payment he was giving his cheques and drafts to the respondent-1 firm and the respondents were after deducting their commission, were making payment to the complainant and that's how the transactions were made. The complainant was giving th
The appellate court must respect trial court findings of acquittal unless substantial errors are demonstrated, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence is reinforced in acquittal cases, with the burden of proof on the complainant to establish the enforceable debt and financial capacity.
The appellate court has the authority to review evidence in acquittal appeals, but must respect the presumption of innocence and ensure that any findings against the accused are based on substantial ....
The presumption of innocence is reinforced upon acquittal, and appellate courts must not interfere unless the trial court's findings are unreasonable or flawed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly regarding the negotiability of cheques in the case of a closed ac....
A complainant's failure to send a statutory notice within the prescribed timeframe as outlined in S.138 does not invalidate a complaint if proper payment receipts are demonstrated.
Point of Law : Dishonour of cheque - Presumption in favour of the holder is apparent on the face of record. Therefore, it is required to be presumed that cheques in question were drawn for considerat....
Point of law : Presumption Under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of p....
The statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act places the initial burden on the complainant to prove the circumstances under which the cheque was issued and that it was....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
