IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI, JJ.
Vimalkumar Lallubhai Patel - Petitioner
Versus
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Surat – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 14772 of 2023 With R/Special Civil Application No. 14864 of 2023
Decided On : 14-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment rationale and principles applied. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
1 Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Tushar Hemani with learned advocate Ms.Vaibhavi Parikh for the petitioner and learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Karan Sanghani for the respondent. Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Hemani has tendered the Additional Affidavit affirmed on 08.07.2025 in both petitions containing the Assessment Order passed in case of the petitioner after filing of the petitions, copy of appeal memo in Form 35 filed by the petitioner against the same Assessment Order, copy of Assessment Order of the co-owner and copy of the screen shot of the grievance raised by the petitioner on-line on 24.06.2025. Additional Affidavit filed today is ordered to be taken on record.
2 Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr.Karan Sanghani waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.
3 Having regard to the controversy involved in this petition in narrow compass with the consent of the learned advocates for the parties, both the petitions are taken up for final hearing.
4 As both the petitions are arising out of the denial of benefit of the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016, the same were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order as the facts are similar.
5 For the sake of convenience, Special Civil Application No.14772 of 2023 is treated as the lead matter.
6 The petitioner of SCA No. 14772 of 2023 filed the declaration in Form No.1 under Sec.183 of the FINANCE ACT , 2016, which introduced “Income Declaration Scheme, 2016”(for short the “IDS”).
6.1 As per the IDS, an assessee is required to file declaration of undisclosed income within the prescribed time limit subject to payment of applicable taxes, surcharge and penalty on or before 30.11.2016.
6.2 The petitioner filed Form No.1 under the IDS declaring the undisclosed income of Rs.27,33,840/- for the Assessment Year 2012- 13. As per the Form No.1, the petitioner was required to pay a sum of Rs.12,30,228/- comprising of the tax @30% amounting to Rs.8,20,152/-, surcharge thereon @25% amounting to Rs.2,05,038/- and penalty of Rs.2,05,038/-
6.3 The assessee also disclosed in the Form No.1 that the assessee had paid an amount of Rs.6,90,960/- on 23.12.2015 towards tax payable, surcharge and penalty.The declaration in Form No.1 was filed on 30.09.2016. Annexure to the Form No.1 described the nature of undisclosed income as income as per Sec.50C of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short ‘the Act’)on sale of agricultural land located at Survey No.156/2, Block No.164 Palsana, Surat. The respondent department on 15.10.2016 issued Form 2 acknowledging the declaration filed by the petitioner. On receipt of Form 2, the petitioner made the payment of balance tax amount on 25.11.2016. The petitioner, thereafter, filed Form No.3 on 30.11.2016 under Rule4(4) of the Income Declaration Rules,2016 (for short “the IDS Rules”), showing the payment of Rs.12,30,228/- comprising of Rs.6,90,960/- paid on 23.12.2015 and an amount of Rs.5,39,268/- paid on 25.11.2016 along with the challans showing the payment made by the petitioner.
6.4 The respondent, however, by an e-mail dated 22.09.2017 directed the petitioner to submit Form No.3 pertaining to the payment of the third and final installment of tax on the unaccounted income declared under the IDS along with copies of challan with respect of payment of tax, surcharge and penalty as prescribed and the petitioner was also directed to upload Form No.3 through E-filing system on or before 30.09.2017. The petitioner, by reply e-mail dated 26.09.2017, informed the respondent that the petitioner has already paid the entire tax before 30.11.2016 as notified under sec.184 of the FINANCE ACT , 2016 and has also filed Form No.3 manually as the on-line system was not allowing such form to be filed. It is also pointed out that the amount deposited by the petitioner is not reflected in Form 26AS and due to not showing such payment, there is a
Umesh D. Ganore vs. Principal Commissioner of Income tax.
Kamla Chandrasingh Kabali vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax.
The court ruled that pre-IDS payments can be considered valid for claiming benefits under the Income Disclosure Scheme, establishing entitlement despite prior payment timelines.
Advance tax is entitled to the same dispensation as tax deducted at source (TDS) and should be credited against the liability under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the provisions of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) and the consequences of failure to comply with the specified ti....
The amount deposited under the Income Declaration Scheme could not be forfeited and should be adjusted under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act.
The voluntary disclosure of income under the VDIS should not be included in the total income for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act, and the tax paid under VDIS is not refundable.
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Kaustubh Fadnis For the Respondent : Ms. Veena Mandlik
Non-compliance to the principles of natural justice by the designated committee while rejecting a declaration would impeach the decision making process rendering the decision invalid in law.
The court ruled that misstatements in declarations under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme negate eligibility for relief, emphasizing the necessity of accurate claims regarding CENVAT credit utilization.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.