SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, Amar Nath (Kesharwani), JJ.
Subhash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax Indore & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2271 of 2001
Decided On : 04-03-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Kaustubh Fadnis, for the Appellant, Ms. Veena Mandlik, for the Respondent.

The voluntary disclosure of income under the VDIS should not be included in the total income for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act, and the tax paid under VDIS is not refundable.

Headnote:

Income Tax - Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme - Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 62 to 78

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an employee of United India Insurance Company, failed to file income tax returns for several assessment years. He later availed the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS) and filed belated returns, claiming a refund of tax paid under VDIS. The Commissioner of Income Tax rejected the revisions, stating that the petitioner was not eligible for the basis exemption under VDIS and that the nature of assets disclosed under VDIS did not match the source of income shown in the returns.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's actions were not in line with the VDIS provisions. It held that the income disclosed under VDIS should not be included in the total income for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act, and the tax paid under VDIS is not refundable under any circumstances. The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Commissioner's order.

Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's eligibility for the basis exemption under VDIS, the mismatch between the nature of assets disclosed under VDIS and the source of income shown in the returns, and the permissibility of claiming a refund of tax paid under VDIS.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the income disclosed under VDIS should not be included in the total income for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act and that the tax paid under VDIS is not refundable. It also highlighted that the petitioner's actions were not in line with the VDIS provisions.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Commissioner's order.

ORDER

Petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 29.03.2021 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax, whereby revision filed under section 264 of Income Tax Act in respect of assessment of the year 1996-97 and 1997-98 has been disposed of against the petitioner.

The facts of the case in short are as under: -

1. Petitioner became the assessee of the income tax department in the year 1997-98. At the relevant time, he was an employee of United India Insurance Company. He did not file an income tax return from 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96,1996-97 and 1997-98 within the prescribed time as per provision of 139 (1) of Income Tax Act. He filed his IT returns for the above 4 assessment years only on 23.01.1998. According to the petitioner, he could not file the above IT returns within the prescribed time because certificates under Section 203 of Income Tax Act vide form No. 16 which were issued by the employer only on 24.06.1993, 31.05.1994, 03.05.1995, 13.05.1996 and 11.07.1997 for the assessment year 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98 respectively. According to the petitioner the advance tax had already been paid for the aforesaid assessment year well before the prescribed due dates by the employer. In these returns, the petitioner has shown his regular income from salary, interest, dividends and capital gains.

2. The Central Government introduced the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as "VDIS") by introducing CHAPTER IV comprising sections 62 to 78 in the Finance Act, 1997. Under the VDIS all persons were permitted to submit income tax return between the period the date of commencement of scheme till 31st day of December 1997 in respect of any income chargeable to tax under the Income-tax for any assessment year, firstly- for which he has failed to furnish a return, secondly-which he has failed to disclose in a return of income tax furnished by him, thirdly, which has escaped assessment by reason of the omission or failure on the part of such person to make a return under the income tax Act. Under Section 65 of Finance Act, 1997, a declaration under subsection 64 shall be made to the Commissioner of IT in the prescribed form. The tax payable under this scheme shall be paid by the declarant and shall submit proof of payment of such tax. Section 68 of Finance Act, 1997 provides that income so voluntarily disclosed shall not be included in the total income of the declarant for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act on two conditions namely the declarant credits such amount in the books of account, if any, maintained by him and the income-tax in respect of voluntarily disclosed income tax is paid by the declarant within the time specified in section 66 or section 67. After fulfilling aforesaid requirements, the Commissioner shall grant a certificate to the declarant. Section 70 says that any amount of tax paid under this VDIS scheme shall not be refundable under any circumstances.

3. The petitioner took the advantage of aforesaid VDIS scheme and filed an application under Section 65 (1) of the said act on 19.12.1997 disclosing the income to the tune of Rs.1,57,410/-, Rs. 1,81,823/-, Rs. 2,54,955/-, Rs.3,34,234/- and Rs. 4,46,525/- for the assessment year 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997 -98. The petitioner has shown the aforesaid income from sources namely cash, debtors, shares and bank account, which is as under:-

Availability of value of assets as on 31st each year as per Balance- Sheet attached with the returns of income for the A. Y. 1993-94:94-95:95-96, 95-97:97-98

Asstt.Yrs

1993-94

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

Particulars case

47102

96318

139234

205501

314396

Debtors

373459

467752

625577

930577

11,33,6577

Shares

107735

157410

156859

122259

128469

Bank A/c

70917

99357

187884

166149

170286

Value of total assets

599213

820838

1109554

1124486

1746728

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSETS DISCLSOE D UNDER VDIS

157410

181823

254955

334234

446525

4. In the IT returns for the assessment year 1996-97 and 1997-9

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top