IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.K.THAKKER
Chief Officer, Dhoraji Nagarpalika – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Saurastra Majoor Mahajan Sangh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. K. THAKKER, J.
1. This petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal, Rajkot in Reference (IT) No.55 of 2019 dated 20.01.2023, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted the benefit of permanency to the respondent from the date on which the respondent completed 240 days of service. The Tribunal has further directed that the interregnum period shall be considered for notional benefits.
2. It is the case of the present petitioner that the respondents had joined the petitioner–Municipality on the post of driver on a daily wage basis in the year 1995. Respondent No.1, namely Vinod Kumar Nathalal Tatamiya, joined on 01.05.1997, and Jitendra Kishanbhai Sondarwa joined on 09.10.1995. Their services came to be terminated by the petitioner, which was challenged by filing Reference (LCR) No.355 of 2001. The learned Labour Court allowed the said Reference in favour of the respondents by granting reinstatement with continuity of service. Challenging the said award, a writ petition was filed before this Court being Special Civil Application No.2342 of 2015, which came to be dismissed by this Court on 27.02.2015, and thereafter, the respondents were
Long-term service in essential roles warrants regularization despite procedural irregularities; employment rights must be upheld in fairness.
Long-term service in essential duties warrants regularization despite initial temporary classification; termination without just cause violates employment rights.
The court held that long-term employees engaged in essential tasks are entitled to regularization despite initial irregular appointments, emphasizing fair employment practices.
The court recognized that long-standing employees performing essential duties are entitled to regularization despite initial temporary designations, emphasizing fairness in employment due to sustaine....
Continuous service by employees performing essential duties can warrant regularization despite procedural irregularities in their initial appointments.
Regularization of long-serving daily wager employees is justified even under contractual terms, ensuring fair treatment and benefits based on continuous service.
Employees with long-term service in essential roles may be regularized despite lacking formal educational qualifications, emphasizing contributions over compliance with procedural norms.
(1) Regularisation of temporary employees – Appellants’ long and uninterrupted service for periods extending well beyond ten years, cannot be brushed aside merely by labelling their initial appointme....
Regularization of long-serving daily wage employees is mandated after 10 years of service, acknowledging functional continuity despite initial irregularities, violating constitutional rights otherwis....
Continuous long service in essential roles grants employees the right to regularization despite initial contractual labels, promoting equity in employment practices.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.