Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
H. Mohammed Zakir S/o H. Nisar Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer:
I. A writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated. 21/08/2023 bearing no. 512020/DMA/EST2/DWE/41/2021 passed by the 2nd Respondent vide ANNEXURE-X in the interest of justice and equity and the consequently issue appropriate directions to the respondents herein for regularization of the petitioners from the date on which they completed 10 years of continue service with all consequential benefits.
II. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend all monetary benefits including fixation of pension to the Respondent No.3, 4, 7 and 8, in the interest of justice and equity.
III. Pass any other appropriated order yes as this Hon’ble Court deem fit to made the ends of justice and equity.
2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Sunil Desai and Sri.Chetan T. Limbikai, appearing for petitioners, learned HCGP- Smt.Girija Hiremath, appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 and learned counsel Sri.C.V.Angadi and Sri.Sharanabasavaraj, appearing for respondent No.3.
3. The petitioners, most of them who have retired, are at the doors of this Court, seeking regularization of their services that they ha
Regularization of long-serving daily wage employees is mandated after 10 years of service, acknowledging functional continuity despite initial irregularities, violating constitutional rights otherwis....
Regularization of employees with irregular appointments who have served for a significant duration is constitutionally mandated when they fulfill essential duties, emphasizing equity and justice in p....
Long-standing service and fulfillment of criteria establish entitlement for regularization under service law, preventing arbitrary denial of rights.
Long-serving employees in essential roles are entitled to consideration for regularization despite initial irregular appointments, ensuring fairness and adherence to constitutional principles.
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
The court reaffirmed that long-serving employees, despite irregular appointments, are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the importance of continuity of service without considering minor lapses ....
Long-term employees performing essential and continuous functions may claim regularization after a decade of service, despite previous procedural irregularities.
Continuous service exceeding ten years entitles the employee to consideration for regularization, requiring adherence to prior court directives and government orders.
Long-term employees, fulfilling essential duties, are entitled to regularization after 10 years of service despite irregular appointments, emphasizing fairness and preventing exploitation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
