Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M.K.THAKKER
Sanjaybhai Mohanbhai Dodiya – Appellant
Versus
Range Forest Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to award for compensation instead of reinstatement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. assessment of evidence and contractual obligations. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding nature of termination and entitlement to reinstatement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. clarification on retrenchment and application of id act provisions. (Para 7) |
| 5. dismissal based on non-applicability of previous judgments and lack of retrenchment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
M.K. THAKKER, J.
1. This petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award passed by learned labour court, Junagadh in Reference (L.C.J.) No.63 of 2015 dated 07.05.2019 whereby, learned reference court has awarded the lump sum compensation of Rs.10,000/- towards full and final settlement of the award.
2. The gist of the case is that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Sweeper on 08.10.2005 on a contractual basis, drawing monthly wages of Rs. 5,500/-. On 15.04.2015, as per the allegations made by the petitioner, his services were terminated without following the due procedure prescribed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred
Termination of a contractual employee upon contract expiry does not qualify as retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, thus not requiring reinstatement.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of compliance with the Industrial Disputes Act in cases of termination, highlighting the distinction between different types of appointments and the need for ev....
Violation of provisions under Sections 25F and 25H of the ID Act led to the direction for reinstatement without backwages.
Retrenchment of a daily wage earner was declared illegal due to violation of section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, mandating adherence to the Last-In, First-Out principle.
Labour Law - Reinstatement in services – It is trite law that when termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under ....
Compensation may be awarded instead of reinstatement even when termination is found illegal, especially for contractual employment, reflecting the court's discretion to balance justice and legal prin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
