IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J., D.N.RAY, J.
Shalby Limited - Appellant
Versus
Dr. Dhiraj Marothi - Respondent
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8507 of 2025
Decided on : 01-07-2025
ORDER :
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
1. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record, we may note that, at the outset, the challenge to the judgment and order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the Judge, Commercial Court, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad in application at Exh. 46 filed by the defendant is on the premise that the provision of Order XI Rule 21 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) had wrongly been invoked by the Commercial Court in entertaining the application at Exh. 46 filed by the defendant under the said provision. Attention of the Court is invited to Section 16 of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015, which reads as under:-
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
16. Amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in its application to commercial disputes.—(1) The provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall, in their application to any suit in respect of a commercial dispute of a Specified Value, stand amended in the manner as specified in the Schedule.
(2) The Commercial Division and Commercial Court shall follow the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as amended by this Act, in the trial of a suit in respect of a commercial dispute of a Specified Value.
(3) Where any provision of any Rule of the jurisdictional High Court or any amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), by the State Government is in conflict with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as amended by this Act, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended by this Act shall prevail.
2. The schedule under Section 16 amended Order XI of the CPC contained in the schedule to the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015 further reads as under:-
ORDER XI
DISCLOSURE, DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS IN SUITS BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF A HIGH COURT OR A COMMERCIAL COURT
1. Disclosure and discovery of documents.—(1) Plaintiff shall file a list of all documents and photocopies of all documents, in its power, possession, control or custody, pertaining to the suit, along with the plaint, including:—
(a) documents referred to and relied on by the plaintiff in the plaint;
(b) documents relating to any matter in question in the proceedings, in the power, possession, control or custody of the plaintiff, as on the date of filing the plaint, irrespective of whether the same is in support of or adverse to the plaintiff’s case;
(c) nothing in this Rule shall apply to documents produced by plaintiffs and relevant only––
(i) for the cross-examination of the defendant’s witnesses, or (ii) in answer to any case set-up by the defendant subsequent to the filing of the plaint, or (iii) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.
(2) The list of documents filed with the plaint shall specify whether the documents in the power, possession, control or custody of the plaintiff are originals, office copies or photocopies and the list shall also set out in brief, details of parties to each document, mode of execution, issuance or receipt and line of custody of each document.
(3) The plaint shall contain a declaration on oath from the plaintiff that all documents in the power, possession, control or custody of the plaintiff, pertaining to the facts and circumstances of the proceedings initiated by him have been disclosed and copies thereof annexed with the plaint, and that the plaintiff does not have any other documents in its power, possession, control or custody.
Explanation.––A declaration on oath under this sub-rule shall be contained in the Statement of Truth as set out in the Appendix.
(4) In case of urgent filings, the plaintiff may seek leave to rely on additional documents, as part of the above declaration on oath and subject to grant of such leave by Court, the plaintiff shall file such additional documents in Court, within thirty days of filing the suit, along with a declaration on oath that the plaintiff has produced all the documents in i
AI
The court clarified that under the Commercial Courts Act, a party's failure to comply with document production orders may lead to adverse inferences and costs, while ensuring relevance is maintained ....
Order XI Rule 1(c)(ii) of the CPC permits document production to counter claims made by defendants, allowing flexibility in commercial suits.
The court established that mere reference to documents in a written statement does not satisfy the requirement of 'reasonable cause' for late submission under the amended Civil Procedure Rules.
In commercial litigation, negligence or inadvertence does not constitute 'reasonable cause' for late document disclosure; strict adherence to procedural timelines is mandatory under the Commercial Co....
The Commercial Courts Act mandates strict disclosure obligations, requiring all documents to be submitted at the outset. Late submissions necessitate a clear justification for non-disclosure, which w....
Procedural violations should not impede justice, and courts must favor substantial justice over rigid adherence to rules, particularly when no prejudice to the opposing party has been demonstrated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.