Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V.Pinto
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Bodubhai Abdulbhai Khafi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. Pinto, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 02.01.2017 in Special (Electricity) Case No.12 of 2012 passed by the learned Special Judge and 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’), whereby, the Trial Court has acquitted the respondent from the offence punishable under Sections 135 and 150 of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The respondents are hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:
2.1. The accused No.2 was the owner of a house situated in Shankar Takeri area in Bapa Sitaram Chowk, opposite the lane of Shaikh Floor Mill and the accused No.2 had given the property on a monthly rent of Rs.1000/- to the accused No.1. The accused No.1 had started an electric furnace for making brass parts, and even though, the accused no.1 was not a consumer
An appellate court must respect a trial court's acquittal unless evidence of manifest injustice is clear and compelling.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court should defer to the trial court's findings unless compelling evidence of manifest error or illegality exists.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere unless there is clear illegality or perversity in the trial court's judgmen....
In appeals against acquittal, the court must show compelling reasons to overturn the acquittal, favoring the principle of presumption of innocence and the need for conclusive evidence.
An appellate court can review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless there is clear illegality or perversity.
The appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and not disturb acquittals without compelling reasons.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and that procedural errors existed in filing the complaint.
In appeal against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants affirmation of the trial court's judgment.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal cases but should not overturn unless there is clear illegality or lack of evidence supporting the conviction.
In appeals against acquittals, courts must uphold the presumption of innocence unless a lack of evidentiary support leads to a manifest error in the trial court's judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
