Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V.Pinto
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Chandulal Arjanbhai Nandasana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. Pinto, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 29.01.2016 in Special (Electricity) Case No.298 of 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge and 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned trial Court’), whereby, the learned trial Court has acquitted the respondent from the offence punishable under Sections 135 of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
1.1 The respondent is hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as he stood in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:
2.1. The accused was in possession of a shop situated near Ram Mandir in Lalpur and was having Consumer No. 82201/04244/1 for consumption of electricity and was a consumer of Gujarat Electricity Board. The accused had illegally and unauthorizedly tapped the electric pole in the main service line and had joined the same in his panel and had bypassed the meter so that the consumptio
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court should defer to the trial court's findings unless compelling evidence of manifest error or illegality exists.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and that procedural errors existed in filing the complaint.
An appellate court can review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless there is clear illegality or perversity.
In appeals against acquittal, the court must show compelling reasons to overturn the acquittal, favoring the principle of presumption of innocence and the need for conclusive evidence.
The appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and not disturb acquittals without compelling reasons.
An appellate court must respect a trial court's acquittal unless evidence of manifest injustice is clear and compelling.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but must respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere unless there is clear illegality or perversity in the trial court's judgmen....
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal cases but should not overturn unless there is clear illegality or lack of evidence supporting the conviction.
In appeals against acquittals, courts must uphold the presumption of innocence unless a lack of evidentiary support leads to a manifest error in the trial court's judgment.
In appeal against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants affirmation of the trial court's judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
