SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1838

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Gomanbhai Parshottambhai Prajapati – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant :Monali Bhatt For the Respondent: Vijay H. Nangesh

JUDGMENT :

GITA GOPI, J.

1. The present Appeal has been preferred by the State under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘Cr.P.C”) against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No.276 of 2007 dated 08.04.2009. The trial against the accused was conducted under Sections 498A, 323 and 306 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC). The sole accused as the husband came to be convicted for all the offences. For the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC, the accused was sentenced to undergo two years simple imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in failure of payment of fine, to undergo further one month of simple imprisonment.

1.1. For the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, the accused was sentenced to undergo three years simple imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in failure of payment of fine, to undergo further one month of simple imprisonment. It was observed in the order that since the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC gets included in the offence under Section 498A IPC, no separate order was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top