Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI
Shah Foils Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the constitutionality of service tax rules. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments aligned with prior judgments regarding service tax. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's directive for a refund of service tax. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT :
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Anand Nainawati for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Param V. Shah for the respondent No.3.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr.Param Shah waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.3.
3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
“(a) Issue an appropriate writ, declaring Rule 10 of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012 and Rule 2(1)(d)(EEC) of the Service Tax Rules , 1994 to be unconstitutional and ultra vires the provisions of the 1994 Act;
(b) Issue an appropriate writ, striking down Section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 10 of the Provision of Service Rules, 2012 in so far as it imposes the levy of service tax on the services by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India, where the service provi
The constitutionality of service tax rules imposing levies on overseas transportation services is deemed ultra vires, mandating refunds of service tax.
Steamer agents and importers cannot be held liable for service tax under challenged notifications as they are not the recipients of service, establishing the necessity for clear recipient-service pro....
Service tax valuation must strictly adhere to the gross amount charged for services rendered, excluding any additional costs or expenses not directly related to the service.
Stay of judgment does not negate its precedential value.
The court emphasized that rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act does not allow reopening of substantive issues already adjudicated, and the writ jurisdiction is discretionary when alterna....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
