IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
New India Assurance Company Ltd Through Incharge – Appellant
Versus
Modya Sukaji @ Sureshbhai Maganbhai & Ors. – Defendant
R/First Appeal No. 812 of 2012
Decided On : 21-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. insurance company's challenge against the compensation order. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding liability for interest and penalty. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on liability and calculations. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusion and order regarding the appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant - insurance company under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter be referred to as “the Act”) challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 06.01.2012 passed by the learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Labour Court, Himmatnagar in “Workmen Compensation (Non-Fatal) Case No. 3 of 2005 whereby the learned Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed by the claimant and awarded the compensation of Rs.2,71,656/- along with the penalty and interest.
2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order of the learned Commissioner, the present first appeal is filed by the appellant – insurance company on the grounds that learned Commissioner has committed an error in fastening the interest and penalty upon the insurance company.
3. Heard Mr.K. V. Gadhia, learned counsel appearing for the appellant – insurance company and Mr.Harshad Patel, learned counsel appearing for respondents – claimants at length.
4. Mr.Gadhia, learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted the same facts which are narrated in the memo of appeal and has submitted that as per the terms of the insurance policy at Ehibit 35, the insurance company is not liable for the payment of interest and penalty and thus the learned Commissioner has committed serious error of law and facts in awarding 12% interest, which was fastened upon the appellant instead of original employer. Mr.Gadhia, learned counsel has referred to and relied upon Sections 4 read with Section 5 of the Act which provides the method of calculating the wages. Section 4 and Section 5 of the Act reads as under:-
“4. Amount of compensation. - (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the amount of compensation shall be as follows, namely:-
| (a) where death results from the injury | An amount equal to [fifty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the deceased [employee] multiplied by the relevant factor: or an amount of [one lakh and twenty thousand rupees], whichever is more; |
| (b) where permanent total disablement results from the injury | An amount equal to [sixty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the injured [employee] multiplied by the relevant factor; or an amount of [one lakh and forty thousand rupees], whichever is more: |
[Provided that the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, from time to time, enhance the amount of compensation mentioned in clauses (a) and (b).]
Explanation I. - For the purposes of clause (a) and clause (b), “relevant factor, in relation to [an employee] means the factor specified in the second column of Schedule IV against the entry in the first column of that Schedule specifying the number of years which are the same as the completed years of the age of the [employee] on his last birthday immediately preceding the date on which the compensation fell due.
| (c) where permanent partial disablement result from the injury | (i) in the case of an injury specified in Part II of Schedule I, such percentage of the compensation which would have been payable in the case of permanent total disablement as is specified therein as being the percentage of the loss of earning capacity caused by that injury; and (ii) in the case of an injury not specified in Schedule I, such percentage of the compensation payable in the case of permanent total disablement as is proportionate to the loss of earning capacity (as assessed by the qualified medical practitioner) permanently caused by the injury; |
Explanation I.-- Where more injuries than one are caused by the same accident, the amount of compensation payable under this head shall be aggregated but not so in any case as to exceed
The insurance company is not liable for interest payments under the Workmen's Compensation Act; liability rests with the employer to pay compensation and associated interest.
The assessment of disability under the Workmen Compensation Act must adhere strictly to statutory provisions, limiting discretion in establishing percentage of disability and wage calculations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the penalty under Section 4-A(3)(b) of the Workmen's Compensation Act is the liability of the employer and not the insurance company.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company is primarily liable to pay compensation to the workmen under the Workmen Compensation Act.
An insurer is not liable for interest on compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act if the policy expressly excludes such liability.
An insurer's liability excludes interest and penalties if the insurance policy explicitly states such exclusions, as determined under commercial contract principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.