IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ganeshbhai Motibhai Bareea – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by learned Special Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 35 of 2011 on 26- 03-2012, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504, and 114 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter referred to as "IPC" for short) and Section Section 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “Atrocities Act”).
1.1 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as the accused in the rank and file as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:-
2.1 On 24-06-2011, at around 20:.00 hours, the accused Nos. 1 to 3 were teasing Sandhyaben Vasava - the niece of the complainant Leelaben Ambalal Vasava at Kelod village and Ambalal Mathurbhai Vasava - the husband of the complainant Leel
In acquittal appeals, the appellant court must respect the presumption of innocence and will not overturn acquittals unless the trial court's findings are unreasonable or perverse.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal cases but should not interfere unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
An appellate court has broad powers to review evidence in acquittal appeals but should exercise caution, respecting the presumption of innocence unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable.
In acquittal appeals, presumption of innocence is reinforced, and the appellate court should only interfere with the acquittal if the trial court's ruling is perverse or unreasonable based on the pre....
Presumption of innocence is reinforced upon acquittal; appellate courts must not disturb findings if trial courts' views are reasonable and plausible.
The appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but should not reverse a trial court's acquittal unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse.
In appeals against acquittal, conviction requires clear evidence; presumption of innocence is paramount, and acquittals should not be reversed without manifest illegality.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by evidence.
Appellate courts must not interfere with acquittals unless trial decisions are perverse, respecting innocence presumption and allowing reasonable alternative conclusions.
An appeal against acquittal should respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere if the acquittal is based on reasonable conclusions drawn from evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.