IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ishwarbhai Dungarbhai Prajapati – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. Pinto, J.
1. The appeal is filed by the appellant State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Surendranagar (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Trial Court”) in Special Case No. 47/2011 on 11.09.2012 whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 427, 504 and 114 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(10) of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “the Atrocity Act” for short).
1.1 During the pendency of the appeal, the respondent no.1 has expired and vide order of this Court dated 15.02.2023 the appeal qua the respondent no. 1 is disposed of as infructuous.
1.2 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as “the accused” in the rank and file as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1 The complainant - Tejabhai Amrabhai Solanki was residing in Solanki Niwas, Nava Darwaja, Vadhwan and on 20.04.2011 at around 16.00 hours, the accu
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and can only interfere with acquittals where the trial court's reasoning is demonstrably flawed.
In appeals against acquittal, conviction requires clear evidence; presumption of innocence is paramount, and acquittals should not be reversed without manifest illegality.
An appellate court cannot overturn an acquittal unless the trial court's reasoning is unreasonable or illegal, maintaining the presumption of innocence unless proved otherwise.
In acquittal appeals, presumption of innocence is reinforced, and the appellate court should only interfere with the acquittal if the trial court's ruling is perverse or unreasonable based on the pre....
An appeal against acquittal should respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere if the acquittal is based on reasonable conclusions drawn from evidence.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence for conviction and the presumption of innocence for the accused.
In acquittal appeals, the presumption of innocence prevails, and the appellate court should only interfere if the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable or perverse.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by evidence.
The appellate court should respect the presumption of innocence in acquittals and only interfere if the trial court's verdict lacks reasonable foundation.
Appellate courts must not interfere with acquittals unless trial decisions are perverse, respecting innocence presumption and allowing reasonable alternative conclusions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.