Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
Ranjanben Ramubhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
District Superintendent Of Police, Surat Rural – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – original appellant State under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and Section 175(3) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’) against the impugned order passed by the learned 10th Additional District Judge, Surat (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Sessions Court’) in Criminal Misc. Application No. 5559 of 2024 dated 13.12.2024, whereby, the learned Trial Court has rejected the application under Section 175(3) of the BNSS filed by the appellant.
1.1 The original appellant is hereinafter referred to as “the appellant” as she stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:
2.1. The appellant is co-owner of Block No. 220, old tenure land admeasuring 16,086 sq. meters situated at Village Siwan, Taluka Olpad, District Surat, holding an undivided share of about 3,567 sq. meters. In the month of August, 2023, Bharat Kataria, a land broker, induced the appellant to sell her
The court held that registration of FIR is mandatory when allegations disclose cognizable offences, and any discretion to omit such registration is legally impermissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. should be sparing and cautious, and the court should only intervene if ....
It is well settled that in order to constitute an offence of cheating, it must be shown that the accused had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the representation or promise and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unsubstantiated allegations, delay in filing a complaint, and discrepancies in the complainant's documents may lead to the quashing of the ord....
Hand writing expert is not a conclusive evidence – Reliance on hand writing expert report to draw inference of criminality would be weak piece of evidence when parties can disprove hand writing exper....
The main legal point established is the mandatory registration of FIR if the information discloses a cognizable offence and the need for a preliminary inquiry in certain cases. The court emphasized t....
Point of law: although Sec. 156(3) is very briefly worded, there is an implied power in the Magistrate under Sec. 156(3) Cr.P.C. to order registration of a criminal offence and / or to direct the off....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
