IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAULIK J.SHELAT
Farzanabanu Mohammadhanif Shaikh, Wd/o. Mohammadhanif Abdulsamad Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Ahmedbad Municipal Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK J.SHELAT, J.
1. Heard Mr. Aakash D. Modi, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. H.S.Munshaw, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 as also Mr. Sikander Saiyed, learned advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4, at length.
2. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr. Munshaw, learned advocate as also Mr. Sikander Saiyed, learned advocate, waive service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respective respondents.
3. The present Writ Petition is filed under Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:-
“15 (A) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order to quash and set aside order dated 17/18.05.2019 passed by the respondent No.2 Authority which is at Annexure-M to this petition.
(AA) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to issue the Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction to quash and set-aside order dated 14.05.2024 passed by the respondent NO.2 Authority which is Annexure-Q to this petition.
(B) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order to direct the present res
Denial of family pension cannot be justified without clear evidence of marriage validation, as admissions and supporting documentation must be duly considered.
Family pension payable to legal representative of deceased does not need a Succession Certificate, even if it were a debt belonging to deceased – Family pension is an independent claim and cannot be ....
Pension benefits cannot be adjudicated through writ jurisdiction in the presence of competing marriage claims; a definitive legal spouse must be established in civil court settings.
Pension is a protected right under Article 300-A of the Constitution; denial of family pension to a legally wedded second wife without due process violates principles of natural justice.
In the absence of any special Rules to the contrary, the nominations referred to under Rule 143 of the Assam (Services) Pension Rules, 1969 will be applicable.
Point of Law : In the absence of any sanction in law, such action by a public authority like APDCL cannot be accepted to be legally valid.
A second wife cannot claim family pension benefits unless she can prove her legal marriage to the deceased employee, as the definition of 'widow' under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, requires legal r....
Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act does not save a second marriage contracted by a Mohammedan male– Petitioner, who is a Hindu had married her deceased husband, who was a Mohammedan, under the Spe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.