Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VIMAL K.VYAS
Sukhadiya Rohit Chimanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Learned advocate Mr. Arbaazkhan A. Pathan appears and submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent no.2 - complainant. The Registry shall accept his vakalatnama.
2. By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant-accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set-aside the judgment and order dated 23.05.2025 passed by the learned 6th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara, in Criminal Case No. 14989 of 2021, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as well as all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.
3. Today, when the matter is called out, the complainant, who is virtually present before this Court, has produced his identity proof as well as the affidavit which are ordered to be taken on record. In the said affidavit, the complainant has categorically stated that he has received his dues and the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved. The complainant has further stated that he has no grievance or ill-will against the applicant.
4. Considering the issue invo
The court may quash criminal proceedings if there is an amicable resolution between the parties, preventing abuse of process of law.
Compounding of offences should not be denied, especially in cases involving negotiable instruments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
