SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 119

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE
Samirbhai Nalinbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul R Dholakia
For the Respondent: Mr Pradip D Bhate

ORDER :

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Pradip D. Bhate, learned advocate waives service of rule for the respondents.

2. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner has been arraigned as an accused in 3 FIRs arising out of the same set of facts and transaction being (i) CR-I No. 11192018220218 of 2022 dated 26.07.2022 registered at Dhandhuka Police Station, Ahmedabad (Rural), (ii) CR-I No. 11190001220293 of 2022 dated 26.07.2022 registered at Barwada Police Station, Botad and (iii) CR-I No. 11190006220446 of 2022 dated 26.07.2022 registered at Ranpur Police Station, Botad for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 304 , 328 and 120B of IPC and Section 67 -1A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submits that in connection with the said FIRs, the petitioner had preferred applications being Cr.M.A. No. 15158 of 2022, Cr.M.A. No. 15170 of 2022 and Cr.M.A. No. 15172 of 2022 before this Court, wherein this Court vide common order dated 15.09.2022 was pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. It is submitted that investigation in connection with the said FIRs has been conc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top